LOW RISK MODEL
Prioritises consistency
7.14% historical max balance drawdown
8.51% historical max equity drawdown
19/19 historical rolling challenge starts reached the illustrative target
53.7-day average completion
-
Lower historical drawdown
-
Slower average challenge completion
-
Designed for customers who prioritise drawdown control
CHOOSE YOUR APPROACH
Choose the trading profile that best matches how you want to approach your prop firm evaluation. Low Risk prioritises drawdown control and consistency, while Medium Risk is designed to pursue challenge targets more aggressively.
Your selected Risk Model is locked to your challenge once trading begins.
Two Risk Models. One Moreland System.
MEDIUM RISK MODEL
Prioritises speed
16.47% historical max balance drawdown
18.85% historical max equity drawdown
18/19 historical rolling challenge starts reached the illustrative target
30.1-day average successful completion from the current test
-
Higher risk per trade
-
Faster historical challenge progression
-
Greater drawdown and higher historical failure frequency
BUILT FOR CONTROLLED EXECUTION
Historically Tested Risk
Moreland has been tested across 575 days of XAUUSD H1 market data, including more than 1,400 closed trades per model.
Low Risk
19/19 historical rolling starts reached the illustrative target, with 8.51% maximum equity drawdown.
Medium Risk
18/19 historical rolling starts reached the illustrative target before the modelled loss threshold, with 18.85% maximum equity drawdown.
Historical simulation only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
NOT EVERY ACCOUNT TRADES IDENTICALLY
Moreland includes controlled execution randomisation.
Entry timing and selected trade parameters are varied within predefined limits so that customers running the same Moreland model do not necessarily produce an identical trade-by-trade execution pattern.
That variation is built into the system while keeping the underlying strategy and risk model unchanged.
METRIC
Risk per trade
Historical max balance drawdown
Historical max equity drawdown
Historical rolling starts passed
Average successful completion time
Best Suited for
LOW RISK VS MEDIUM RISK
A simple comparison of the two Moreland Risk Models
MEDIUM RISK MODEL
0.95%-1.05%
16.47%
18.85%
18/19
30.1 days
Faster progression,
higher risk tolerance
LOW RISK MODEL
0.60%-0.70%
7.14%
8.51%
19/19
53.7 days
Consistency, drawdown control, account survival
